3rd Rolling Workshop on Cultural Policies in Learning Cities held in Pécs in May 2015

Please find featured below and attached the report of the Rolling Workshop on Cultural Policies in Learning Cities held in Pécs in May 2015. This was the third Rolling Workshop on this subject which followed the workshops held in Östersund and Glasgow.

AttachmentSize
report_of_pecs_cultural_policies_workshop.pdf138.48 KB

Comments

The big theme - role of culture in sustainable development?

Now that the three Rolling Workshops have been held it will be useful to look across the three reports and see what came out of the three. For me, the big theme relates to the role of culture in sustainable development, which was a theme in the Pecs workshop.  The test of international views on this subject will come later this year when the United Nations decides the new set of Sustainable Development Goals to replace the Millenenium Development Goals, and decides whether culture will be included in these goals in some way. Bodies such as UNESCO and UCLG have been pressing for this but there is an alternative view that the goals should be as few as possible with a focus on reducing poverty. What do you think?
 
I welcome your views on this question, and on the attached Pecs report. PASCAL also welcomes any further workshops on the subject of cultural policies in learning cities (building on the three workshops held to date) which could be brought into a paper on this subject for the June 2016 Glasgow PASCAL conference.

For discussion in Catania

Thank you for the report! I think your proposal is interesting. Can we discuss that in Catania?

By the way we will in three weeks’ time have Jeremy and his board from Sovereign Hill here at Jamtli. We are then arranging three small seminars on “High season and low season sustainability”, “Contemporary history and social impact” and “Museums, theme parks and heritage enterprises – who are we?” Of course it is still high season here so I doubt how many will participate, but anyway the themes were selected by Jeremy and me, and they very much reflect what’s on the mind in many museums.

 

I’ll of course see if we can produce some minutes from the discussions.

Working with communities rather than for them

Clearly there is an issue around sustainable development and we share this in Glasgow. A strong message that I picked up from the Pecs workshop that we should all consider more closely is the level of engagement we have with our publics; for example the lack of trust cited, the erosion of citizen’s interest because of a lack of active involvement by cultural institutions – ie the difference between working with communities rather than for them. I also sense a challenge to manage the associated bureaucracy of partners and planning/assessments which can be difficult to align with a more open and organic network of activity that supports grass roots development, the volunteer sector, and co-production methodology. I think this is crucial in supporting a wider view of cultural learning and engagement beyond the formal curriculum based structures and major institutions. Also, how do we join up the dots between different audiences and life stages, eg children who come in a family group developing into independent young adult visitors? Clearly for many of our countries poverty is also a critical issue and I would support work on this as we move forward, but sustainable development has to be supported by consistent political and financial support.

Participatory Governance

Hi Victoria,

Wonder if we’re here seeing an interesting relation between sustainable development of cultural institutions and cultural institutions contribution to sustainable development i communities! In what you write – which I really like – I associate to the theme of “participatory governance”.  Or maybe that’s only me ;-)

Best

Henrik

Issues raised by the Pecs report on Cultural Policies

Victoria and Henrik, I found your comments on the Pecs report vey interesting and pertinent, raising things that we should carry forward.

The question of the role of cultural policies in sustainable development clearly raises issues such as those you have comented on Victoria. Outcomes such as the lack of trust and erosion of citizen's interest are areas where cultural institutions can make a contribution through the way they operate and the partnerships they form, especially at the local and regional levels. There is a link here to the learning neighbourhoods pilot projects that Cork and Taipei are undertaking and which East Pecs may possibly join.

I was interested in re-reading Henrik's report on the Ostersund workshop to see that the contribution of museums in this area was raised by Professor Peter Aronsson in the following terms.

     " Museums are recognised as places where identity is constantly created, negotiated and renegotiated and reshaped. Museums are specialists in creating confidence in society through shared ownership in heritage and therefore confidence between people and politics."

It would be very useful if these questions could be taken up by the PASCAL Cultural Policies Network so as to explore some practical examples of cases of cases where museums and libraries have acted to foster a sense of common interest in a community. This would be most interesting in multicultural contexts and communities with considerable diversity such as Glasgow.

The question of confidence and trust between people and the political system has attracted considerable comment in Australia recently with comments (including several books) that argue that there has been a decline in public confidence and trust in the political process that needs to be reversed. I wonder if there are opportunities for cultural institutions and policies to contribute to a necessary process of building identity, trust, and confidence. Can we come up Henrik with some ideas that might be taken up Henrik by the PASCAL Cultural Policies Network with implementation in Ostersund, Glasgow, and other members of the Network. I hope we can maintain a dialogue on these important issues.

 

 

Shared Heritage

Hi Peter and Henrik,

 

I think there is much to explore here to develop thinking and practice. I would also like to suggest, in response to the quote from Professor Aronsson, that we should critique our professional institutions in terms of how we might (inadvertently, passively) damage confidence in society, between people, and I would question the notion of ‘shared heritage’ and how / whether we are achieving this, and actually should that be an ideal goal? I’m playing devil’s advocate here. I’m not saying these aren’t goals that we have, or do well in, or should aspire to, but we should be realistic about how much we are achieving, and also, whether we are potentially still upholding exclusive cultural norms.

 

I absolutely agree with the question of trust and confidence that publics have with not only the political process, but with a number of major national institutions – media, cultural, financial – certainly in the UK I would suggest that is contributing to a general cynicism and erosion of trust. There are a range of ethical questions and scenarios to explore here.

 

I look forward to further feedback after Catania.

 

With best wishes,

 

Victoria

A small pilot study?

Dear Victoria and Henrik,
 
I like your response Victoria. The question is what can cultural institutions do to establish what they are currently doing in addressing such questions and what they might do if they wished to achieve a larger contribution to these key cultural objectives. It would be good if we could achieve a small pilot study with 3 or 4 institutions with the findings discussed at a larger meeting. Will your Nordic Centre Henrik be having a Spring Conference next February like this year where there might be some kind of forum or workshop where feedback could be given to follow up on what has happened since the initial workshop last February. Some of the key ideas, including the comments by Professor Aronsson came from that workshop, so it would be very appropriate to give feedback on what happened later in Glasgow and Pecs and what needs to be followed up on. Might the Nordic Centre Henrik have a role in this in partnership with PASCAL?
 
I hope we can maintain the momentum from this interesting series of workshops
 
With best wishes,
 
Peter

Nordic Centre of Heritage Learning & Creativity conference

Dear Peter,

The Nordic Centre of Heritage Learning & Creativity arrange the spring conference annually in the beginning of February every year. We have had this event for more than ten years now!

 

I know that Anna Hansen and her team are planning the next conference so I’ll leave the issue with her. I should know but I’m not sure what the theme will be for the conference in February.

 

However I think there will be a good opportunity to continue the discussion about participatory governance and trust between the public and the institutions in Glasgow in June.

 

All best

Henrik

Conference Theme - Empathy and Emotions

The theme of the conference 2016 (10th and 11th of February) is "empathy and emotions" - how museums sometimes try to make an impact on people's attitudes concerning empathy, how you learn better if you get emotionally engaged and how people's emotions somtimes are hard to deal with when making exhibitions and presentations. I don't think this discussion will fit in as well as it did with this year's theme. It might be possible to twist it in the direction of museum's abilities to affect people's attitudes, evoke new thoughts - for example towards politics, confidence in society or participation in society. However, the programme is almost ready, so it will be difficult (not yet impossible) to fit it in parallell to three other workshops.
 
 

Key Issue

Dear Henrik and Anna
It would be very good if this could be done. It seems to me that “Empathy and Emotions” has a clear link to the key issues that came out of the 2015 Rolling Workshops. If some connection to questions of identity, citizenship and a sense of belonging could be made these would be valuable contributions to the PASCAL Cultural Policies Network, the paper that you are writing Henrik for the PASCAL Glasgow conference, and the ideas generally that will be taken up at the PASCAL Glasgow conference next June. Empathy and emotions has clear links to important themes in Learning City development in such areas as inclusion, identity, and citizenship and making these connections would add to the idea of museums and their role in 21st century communities.
 
With best wishes
Peter

We’ll see what’s realistic

Dear Peter,

We’ll see what’s realistic to do. The planning for the coming NCK conference has probably come too far at this moment. I think we should look for an alternative way forward. Let’s put our minds to that. Here we are preoccupied with applications and papers beside running the business as such.

We look forward to our Australian visit in two weeks’ time and just two weeks later the directors of open air museums in Europe meet in Oslo for our bi-annual conference. I’ll certainly see what inspiration can come from that to the Cultural Policies Workgroup.

All best

Henrik

Click the image to visit site

Click the image to visit site

Syndicate content
X