Learning Cities 2020

The Chairman of the PASCAL Governing Board, Professor Josef Konvitz, today released information on a new initiative by PASCAL to extend the pioneering work undertaken under the PASCAL International Exchanges (PIE) to a quest to identify future directions for learning cities up to 2020. This initiative will be known as Learning Cities 2020.

Professor Konvitz released the following statement:


 

I am pleased to announce today the inauguration of a dialogue by PASCAL to identify future directions for learning cities up to 2020. This dialogue will be facilitated by a new section of the PIE web site with the designation Learning Cities 2020, and will be launched by a suite of three papers based on lessons from the PIE experience over the past three years prepared for the 11th PASCAL International Conference, Cities Learning Together, to be held in Hong Kong on 18-20 November this year. At a time when people want to know what can work and why, this conference makes a unique contribution to a 2020 vision for learning cities, connecting three years of PASCAL PIE studies to a vision of how much more can be accomplished.

The PASCAL International Exchanges (PIE) project was launched in January 2011 to provide for online exchanges of information and experiences between cities around the world relevant to building sustainable learning cities, and contributing towards the achievement of a universal learning society. There are now twenty papers on the PIE web site for cities located across five continents in what is emerging as a distinctive, perhaps unique, approach to cities sharing insights and learning together.

Stimulus papers may be read on the PIE web site for the following cities: Glasgow, Cork, Limerick, Kaunas, Bari, Bielefeld, Dar es Salaam, Kampala, Dakar, Gaborone, Addis Ababa, Beijing, Shanghai, Hong Kong, Seoul, Gwang Myeong, Hume, Sydney, Vancouver and New York. PASCAL is most grateful to the authors of these papers who have contributed to building profiles of cities around the world that provide a diverse range of perspectives on learning in cities.

The value of these exchanges has been enhanced by the growing diversity in these profiles of key aspects of learning and community building in cities, a theme taken up in the papers that are being posted on the new site. These papers comment on insights of value from the initial phase of PIE development. Some examples of these are:

  • Beijing and Shanghai papers show how learning city strategies can be successful in mega cities this size;
  • The importance of initiatives in local communities is illustrated in both these cities, and in Sydney and New York;
  • Cork and Limerick demonstrate how lifelong learning festivals can provide a platform for broader action towards building sustainable learning cities;
  • The Hume Global Learning Village illustrates the key role of strategic action by local government authorities linked to a clear vision of the future.

PIE exchanges led to conceptual work by PASCAL directed at identifying and advocating more holistic and integrated approaches to building sustainable learning cities that combined the aspirations and objectives of Learning Cities, Healthy Cities, Green Cities, and Cultural Cities. This approach was given the name EcCoWell, and may be seen in papers on the EcCoWell section of the PIE web site. I am delighted that the city of Cork has shown leadership in examining how an EcCoWell approach could be implemented in their city, and that they, inspired by Peter Kearns, co-Director of PIE, will run a conference on this topic on 26 and 27 September 2013 with Professor Michael Osborne, Director of PASCAL (Europe) as keynote speaker.

The EcCoWell papers have now been joined by two further papers, each written by Peter Kearns, prepared for the Hong Kong conference. These papers are the following.

Policy implications for city governments and their partners will be brought into the dialogue on Learning Cities 2020 that I am inaugurating today. The examples I have cited in this statement show areas where cities can build synergies and achieve value added outcomes with benefits for their citizens.

The papers brought into the Learning Cities 2020 site represent the start of this process in distilling insights from the PIE experience over 2011 to 2013. PASCAL will add to these insights in an on-going cumulative process as we move towards a 2020 vision for learning cities in a universal learning society. The outcomes of the PASCAL Hong Kong conference will provide the next key milestone in this process.

I hope that these papers will stimulate an active dialogue through blog exchanges on this site that will add to the evolving ideas on future directions for learning cities that can then be taken up in discussions at the Hong Kong conference, and brought into a post-Hong Kong vision for Learning Cities 2020. I commend these papers and this new PASCAL initiative for your attention and support.

Professor Josef Konvitz
Chair, PASCAL International Observatory
July 15th, 2013

Comments

Cooperating Learning Cities

I have been asked to initiate some discussion about what we mean by a learning city. In particular what might be the difference between a learning city which caters for the needs of its own citizens, and one which looks outwards to the world, realising that economic, social and environmental progress can best be made by interacting with other cities. The following notes might help

There are many definitions of a learning city and the following, put together in discussions about the scope of UNESCO’s International Platform for Learning Cities,  is but one of them.  In my view it encapsulates most of what we understand to be the fuel which drives the learning city engine.

A Learning City is one which invests in quality lifelong learning in order to:

  • liberate the full potential of all its citizens
  • invest in the sustainable growth of its workplaces
  •  re-vitalise the vibrant energy  of its communities
  • enhance the dynamism of all its stakeholders
  •  exploit the creative value of local, regional and international partnerships and
  •  guarantee the responsible implementation of its environmental obligations

In so doing it will release the strength and capacity of all its social, economic, human, intellectual, cultural, technological and environmental resources

All of them need of course to be elaborated into strategies and methodologies that will make them happen, and many cities have already done this. But, for me, it is the fifth one which deserves the most attention in the context both of the conference and its aftermath and in terms of  a vision of a cooperating future. The following definition of a truly global learning city therefore might expand the concept further

A Global Learning City is one which fulfils all the above and...

  • Empowers all its citizens to live in harmony with people of other creeds, colours, countries and cultures
  • Encourages its primary, secondary and tertiary learning providers to participate in the power of international learning by all their staff and students.
  • Widens horizons and action by facilitating international dialogue between citizens
  • Establishes bilateral and multilateral links with other cities to explore how each one can assist the other
  • Recognises the global reach of environmental matters and accepts its obligations to the future of the planet
  • Works with NGOs and INGOs to implement the recommendations of international treaties and obligations
  •  Assists with the development of international trade between cities

Here we have the vision of an interactive world in which cities, their politicians, administrators, teachers, students and citizens use the tools of modern technology to empower their decision-making, their problem-solving, their critical judgement and their empathetic understanding .  A vast network that would improve the lives of people everywhere.

A Utopian dream? Maybe, but a) it’s possible to do it even with modern technology, let alone the improvements that may be made in the future and b) there are benefits. Here are a few of the latter.

Ø  Thousands more people and organisations contributing to the solution of social, cultural, environmental, political and economic problems

Ø  A giant leap in mutual understanding and a tranformation of mind-sets through greater communication between people and organisations

Ø  Profitable economic, trade and technical development through contact between business and industry

Ø  Active interaction and involvement, and a huge increase in available resource through the mobilisation of the goodwill, talents, skills, experience and creativity between cities and regions

Ø  Fewer refugees – developing problems can be anticipated and addressed through cooperation between the cities

Ø  It’s sustainable – because it’s so much more dispersed. Governments and NGOs are no longer the only initiators of aid to the underdeveloped. Action is now shared with the cities and, through them, the people.

Ø  organisations and institutions in the city/region have a real world-class focus and raison d’être

Ø  Again three major advantages – understanding – understanding – understanding leading to solution - solution - solution

 And of course it isn’t going to happen next week, next year, or maybe even within ten years. but isn’t it time we made a start? Funding? How about reserving one tenth of the vast sums spent on destructive military solutions to set up an infrastructure that would create and foster 100 ‘citylinks’ comprising 5-6 cities of which at least one should be from the developing world.  Or, if that is too much to expect, how about inviting large companies to sponsor such links in return for tax breaks?  

Click the image to visit site

Click the image to visit site

Syndicate content
X