Henrik Zipsane
Jamtli is going crazy! Entrance fee up 120 percent!
- People want quality and they are willing to pay for it
The international and European notion of Cultural and Creative Industries has so far not shown much appreciation of the potential of the cultural sector itself and especially the heritage sector. Maybe it is fair or maybe not but the perspective in the conclusions from KEA studies on cultural economy and creativity has been symptomatic for the European approach (KEA 2006 & 2009). KEA concludes that the heritage sector primarily dedicates itself to preservation and do not have the competence to commercially develop the collections and knowledge about the collections. That is better used and developed by somebody else.
I see this as a provocation for my own organization but also realize that the organization I head is unusual among Scandinavian peers. That insight forms the starting point of the following reflections on what we have experienced the last few years at Jamtli.
Jamtli is well known in
The Jamtli museum environment in Östersund includes an open air museum and a large indoor museum. The later contains both permanent and temporary exhibitions and covers themes of archaeology, cultural history and art. Among the exhibited items is the famous Viking Age tapestry from Överhogdal. The open air museum consists of agricultural and urban environments from the 17th Century right up to the later part of the 20th Century which during the summer season are the settings for large scale living history with actors and animals. The environments are complemented with several historically inspired play grounds for children.
In 1984 the museum introduced living history together with children and family oriented actions and playgrounds as the main pedagogical methods during the summer season and named that concept
Taking the next step in professionalizing the historical theme park strategy!
From 2009 to 2012 Jamtli Foundation has invested much effort and much money in developing the main summer season –
Firstly we believe that
Theme park prize policy
Secondly we decided that
Since 5 years the entrance fee for adults to
Adults Children 1 Children 2
- Den gamle By, Århus 16, 0 € (120 DKR) Free (age 0-18)
- Sagnlandet Lejre,
- Hjerl Hedes frilandsmuseum 16, 5 € (125 DKR) Free (age 0-18)
- Bork Vikingehavn, Skjern 12, 5 € (90 DKR) Free (age 0-18)
- Maihaugen,
- Norsk Folkemusuem,
- Gamle Bergen Bymuseum 9, 5 € (70 NOK) Free (age 0-18)
- Sverresborg,
- Skansen,
- Fredriksdal,
- Kulturen,
- Fornsalen,
-
The 2011 admission fee for Jamtli 12, 0 € (110 SEK) Free (age 0-19)
At Jamtli this prize level has for several years found its internal explanation in the argument that during the summer “Jamtli offer so much” and the prize level has for several years been accompanied by some special offers: Free entrance for children up till 18 years, the ticket is valid two days in a row, the Jamtli ticket gives free entrance to our sister museum – Sverresborg – in Trondheim, Norway, retired and disabled people from the local community has free entrance and special activities on Tuesdays and quite cheap annual tickets for both individuals and families.
In the summer 2010 we knew that we would be investing quite a lot of money in Jamtli until 2012 and we decided to study prize policies. In the summer 2010 we saw the following entrance prize levels at comparable organizations (for current comparison you can here see the 2012 level also):
Adult Children
LOCAL:
Frösö Zoo (local zoo) (22 €) 20 € (180 SEK) 10 € (90 SEK)
Storsjöbadet (local water land) (30 €) 30 € (270 SEK) 7 € (60 SEK)
OPEN AIR MUSEUMS INTERNATIONALLY
Beamish (
Sovereign Hill (
Colonial
THEME AND LEISURE PARKS IN
Astrid Lingrens värld (Fantasy Land for Children) (39 €) 33 € (295 SEK) 19 € (175 SEK)
Sommarland Leksand (Family Amusement Park) (32 €) 29 € (260 SEK) Free
Skara Sommarland (Family Amusement Park) (33 €) 31 € (279 SEK) Free
Gröna lund (Tivoli typ Amusement Park) (33 €) 32 € (289 SEK) Free
Liseberg (Tivoli typ Amusement Park) (41,5 €) 33 € (295 SEK) Free
Kolmården (Large zoo with park including safari) (44 €) 34 € (310 SEK) 22 € (200 SEK)
We see that the organizations with whom we compare ourselves in terms of offering high quality experiences for families for several hours has a prize level of about 20-40 € for adults and about half that prize for children. The organizations who claims free entrance for children defines children as younger than 6 years old or simply “shorter than one meter”.
The board discussed the issue during the autumn 2010 and winter 2010/2011 with the summer 2010 prizes as reference. In February 2011 the board decided that a reasonable prize level for adult entrance fee to Jamtli History Land should be 27,5 € (240 SEK) from the summer 2012 and that we should preserve the principle of free entrance for children and even extend it from up till 18 to up till 19 years of age. We should even preserve the other above mentioned special offers.
A prize level for Jamtli History Land at 27 € for adults would in comparison to international leisure and adventure parks not be high in 2012 but in comparison with Scandinavian museums it would be quite out of league.
The primary reason why the board of Jamtli Foundation could decide that
The process from decision to implementation
Being known already as one of the most expensive “museums” to visit a rise in admission fee with almost 120 percent from 12 € to 27 € demanded for preparation – politically, for the media, the locals, the local tourist industry and for the staff.
All these groups had to be addressed at the same time in parallel settings. Of course there has been letters to the editors of the regional news papers with protests and the arguments have all the time been about either the problems created for low income families and retired people or the opponents have argued that it must be mismanagement of Jamtlis economy which make the entrance fee increase necessary. Every time we have answered correctly and as polite as possible that we have very cheap annual tickets especially designed for the local population who often have three or more visits to Jamtli per year. We have also explained that part of our mission is to live on tourism and therefore should the tourists pay what it cost to run
The same arguments were in many different terminologies and disguises presented for politicians at the County Council and the Municipal Council at more than one occasion. That was absolutely necessary as we experienced how rumours were shaped and spread. The tourist industry in the region and in the municipality where Jamtli is located had no problems in understanding our arguments and we have actually experiences how our status from the perspective of this branch has been strengthened. The hotels, restaurants, tourism information centres know we are depending on having a professional attitude towards tourism and when we show that competence we get acknowledgement.
For the staff the way to implement the decision of the new entrance fee was another process. Three issues were discussed again and again. First of all the staff had to believe in themselves and the product they offer to the public. It is a product of high quality and it should be sold at a prize which reflects the true value of it. Secondly we of course knew that we will have reactions from visitors who will complain and will try their best to convince our staff that the new prizes are to high and they will try by all means to get a cheaper deal. Thirdly the staff is in this process together! We will all be more dependent on each other and we will all need to feel the collective support of our colleagues.
At management level we naturally also had to work out not only a plan B – if it all fails one way or another and people just do not come. We also had to think in pro-active terms and prepare to meet al critical thinking in a positive, friendly, understanding and correct way. And that critique could come from everywhere!
At management and board level the policy thinking presented in the green paper on cultural and creative industries by the European Commission in 2010 was used in internal and external discussion. By creating a clear relation between the entrance income and the cost of the product offered through the right price level on the entrance fee we would be market sensitive but also secure the jobs involved in the production (European Commission 2010). Further studies in the literature showed that this liberal attitude towards commercialisation of culture did not conflict with national politics and were in line with the recommendations from council and sector work groups (OMC 2010 & Platform CCI 2009).
Reactions from the public and the visitors
The reactions have been threefold. Fist of all we have of course had some reactions in media from journalists searching for stories and from the public as letters to the editors. Journalists have tried to create a relation between the decision about a higher entrance fee and the general economic situation for Jamtli as such during the period of international economic crisis. The board and management of Jamtli have met this journalism by offering all necessary financial information and have of course experiences that this media coverage has had a normal impact on budget discussions between the foundation and the founders.
The public reaction through media have predominantly been of the kind which question the socio economic aspect and a few from self appointed “experts” claiming that this will be a disaster and shows the incompetence of the board, the management and even the political leadership of the founders of Jamtli – that being the county council and the municipal council.
Jamtli has answered each and every media reaction even at times when it has been a natural thought that “Well, we have already answered that one time and time again”! We think that this approach has been very important as it demonstrates that the museum cares and that we respect all opinions. Interestingly these media reactions were predominantly placed before the actual summer season. As we came nearer to the season the reactions almost disappeared.
The second and most important form of reactions are from the visitors. Jamtli has a 31,7 percent rise in visitor numbers and has almost doubled the income from entrance fees for Jamtli History Land 2012 compared with 2011 and that year was by no means a bad year! The rise was 33,5 percent for adults and 31,1 percent for children. The only reduction is in the numbers of foreigners who visited Jamtli the summer 2012. There we can see a fall of almost 10 percent. That fall has not only been the case at Jamtli this summer but the experience is shared with other attractions in Östersund and may primarily be explained by the change in exchange rate between the Swedish and Norwegian currency which during 2012 has developed in a not favourable direction for the region in which Jamtli is located.
Of course we can critically add that Jamtli History Land 2012 has been favoured by perfect weather conditions as it has not been too hot or too much rain. The establishment of the new environment of the 1970ies with living history, where Jamtli is first in
We can get some idea about the effect of the entrance fee on the visitors by the reactions experienced in entrance and reception area. The general visitor numbers vary from about 400 on a bad day with to much rain to about 1100 on a good day and we have had from 5 to 20 people who have complained about the price level. At an average every second of the complainants have turned around and left Jamtli and not pursued with their visit. This means that between 1 and 2 percent of the potential visitors showing up at Jamtli has complained and less than 1 percent has turned around and left Jamtli. Is it few or is it many? It is difficult to answer as there are at least two perspectives on the issue.
On the one hand one percent either way in visitor numbers has only a minor impact on the numbers and on the entrance income for Jamtli.
On the other hand we may also respect that we have between 300 and 500 people after the season who will absolutely not be good ambassadors for Jamtli. Unfortunately we also know that almost all the people who turned around and left Jamtli are retired locals who chose to protest and leave even though the reception staff informed about the free entrance for retired people on Tuesdays. Many complainants have taken these offers to their hearts but not all.
From discussions with colleagues at comparable international open air museums we have information that we shall expect this reaction by locals the first 2-3 years after the introduction of international prize level for theme parks. After that period of time the situation will be back to normal and the new price policy will be accepted also by the locals. Jamtli doubled the number of sold annual tickets from 2011 to 2012. There have been several campaigns for the annual ticket system since the autumn 2011 and the modest rise for these annual tickets with 33 percent compared with the 120 percent rise for the standard admission fee for adults to
We do of course not know how many potential visitors who chose not to come to
Financially we are of course very happy and see the new entrance policy as a great success after a 113 percent rise entrance income during the History Land season, which means that we have financed 12 more professional staff during the season and even television advertisement on national television. We had expected a fall in commercial income from restaurant, café, hostel and museum shop but we have had a rise from about 9 percent to about 40 percent commercial turn over in the many different activities.
Impact on the visit and on the organization
When the visitor pays more for the visit he or she also expects “more”!
That “more” is a complex entity as it combines the quality of the service, the experience in itself, the possible and real length of the visit and so on. The visitor also relates these impressions to all over expectations in advance of the visit and for family or group visits both to the visitor herself and to the group.
The visitor survey done the summer 2012 at
It looks like the length of the average stay has grown a little. That may be explained by the growth in the number of offers not least through the latest establishing of the whole new environment from the 1970ies. As there is more to experience it may take more time for a visitor go get around. It may also be the simple case that the visitor wants to get the most for his or her money and therefore spent more time at
For the staff behind
An Example to follow for Culture and Creative Industries
The main overall experience from
There are lots of detailed experiences from which Jamtli staff will learn and the organization including board, management and staff will work with how to take into account these experiences in order to sustain the positive impact of the professionalization in the future.
There are also two very important but somehow hidden lessons from this which the
First of all there is no reason why
Secondly it is likewise interesting that in the shadow of Jamtli History Land we have in Jämtland region experienced that The Land of Technique has followed the entrance policy of Jamtli and in the summer 2012 had an entrance fee for adult on 16,5 € (150 SEK) and free admission for children up to 19 years. There have been no complains what so ever and the number of visitors has gone slightly up. The
European Commission (2010) “Green Paper - Unlocking the potential of cultural and creative industries”, Brussels COM (2010) 183
KEA (2006) “The Economy of Culture in
KEA (2009) “The Impact of Culture on Creativity”, report for the European Commission – General Directorate for Education and Culture http://www.keanet.eu/docs/impactculturecreativityfull.pdf [2]
OMC on CCI (2010) “Final Report from Expert Working Group on maximising the potential of Cultural and Creative Industries, in particular that of SMEs”
Platform on CCI (2009) “Recommendations for Cultural and Creative Industries”, report from Platform on the Potential of Cultural and Creative Industries for the European Commission – General Directorate for Education and Culture
| Attachment | Size |
|---|---|
| 2012 ENTRÉPRISER - 21 INTERNATIONELL JÄMFÖRELSE.doc [3] | 33 KB |